Consolidated paper
draft.md
Markdown · ~270 KB§1 The diagnostic gap · §2 The SPEC protocol (four axes) · §3 Four anonymized audit case studies · §4 Regulatory mapping against six anchors · §5 Limits and open questions
Appendix A — Diagnostic question library
appendix-a-question-library.md
Markdown · 68 questions68 questions across the four SPEC axes (§2.1 Specification: 19; §2.2 Performance: 15; §2.3 Explanation: 19; §2.4 Configuration: 15). Each question carries an axis tag, an exemplar reference, IC-memo-ready text, and an operational note specifying the evidence the question's discharge requires.
Appendix B — Scoring sheet and replication pseudocode
appendix-b-scoring-and-pseudocode.md
Markdown · rubric + four proceduresB.1 v1 Y/N scoring sheet — one rubric block per SPEC axis, IC-memo lift-and-paste-ready. B.2 replication pseudocode for the four load-bearing procedures: entity-blinding (§2.1), WRC/SPA-lite gate (§2.2), κ-on-judge (§2.3), harness-component swap (§2.4). B.3 repository specification.
Bibliography
bibliography.md
Markdown · five sectionsSection A — FOMO triage corpus exemplar slugs cited across §2–§3, §5, and Appendix A. Section B — prior-art and foundational-framework citations. Section C — regulatory and supervisory citations across §4. Section D — citation-magnet precedents. All session-14 verified against the live FOMO database and source documents.
All v1 artifacts are published under CC-BY 4.0. Cite as: Maricic, M. (2026). Evaluating AI-Driven Investment Strategies: A Diagnostic Protocol for Allocators. SPEC v1, 2026-05-21. https://www.milosmaricic.com/spec. CC-BY 4.0.